从“Vernehmen”到“觉知”的多重语际翻译：论海德格尔存在论诠释学对形而上学先验意义的解构

杨乃乔

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

May 2023

Article Contents

Citation: Naiqiao YANG. The Multi-interlingual Translation from “Vernehmen” to “觉知”: On the Deconstruction of the Transcendental Meaning of Metaphysics by Martin Heidegger’s Ontological Hermeneutics[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(3): 162-176. shu

The Multi-interlingual Translation from “Vernehmen” to “觉知”: On the Deconstruction of the Transcendental Meaning of Metaphysics by Martin Heidegger’s Ontological Hermeneutics

Naiqiao YANG

Abstract

Throughout the development of Western hermeneutics, the metaphysical tradition, which dominates the meaning of the origin of the world, makes the ultimate transcendental meaning for covering the phenomenal world as well as the constitution of its moral order. The target of Martin Heidegger’s ontological hermeneutics is the transcendental meaning of “εἶναι” (Sein/Being) originated from Parmenides of Elea. After Sein und Zeit, Heidegger further discussed his ontological hermeneutics in several articles in Identität und Differenz, in order to explore the identity and difference between the meanings of “Sein” and “Dasein”. While translating Parmenides’ famous ancient Greek proverb into German, Heidegger rendered “νοεῖν” into “Vernehmen”, and he took “Denken”/“thinking” as an apposition to give the limited interpretation of meaning to prove the identity of the three concepts, “νοεῖν”, “Vernehmen” and “Denken”. However, Chinese scholars have translated “Vernehmen” into “觉知”, a Chinese concept derived from the Buddhist sutras Abhidharma Mahāvibhāṣā Śāstra. In reality, “Vernehmen” and “觉知” are two very different culturally-loaded words. Translations of these two concepts show creativity of rewriting through mistranlation. It is necessary to remind researchers who engage in the study of literary hermeneutics that what Heidegger’s ontological hermeneutics focuses on is the meaning of identity or difference between noumenon and phenomenon, not the text, especially not the literary text and its aesthetic meaning.
- Heidegger,
- ontological hermeneutics,
- metaphysics,
- “Vernehmen”,
- “觉知”
References
Access
1. [1]
  NI Liangkang . The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 12-22.
2. [2]
  WEN Jun . From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 145-156.
3. [3]
  YING Qi . Hegel's Conception of Reconciliation and the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 23-31.
4. [4]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(5): 211-216.
5. [5]
  ZHOU Mujun . Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 157-170.
6. [6]
  WANG Gang . Viewing the Cultural Intent of the “Xueheng School” from Hu Xiansu's Teachers and Friends's Group. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 206-216.
7. [7]
  FENG Yurong . “Illuminating Ancient Learning,Introducing New Knowledge”: Xin Yizong Bidu and the Shift in the Construction of Modern Traditional Chinese Medicine Knowledge. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(6): 180-190.
8. [8]
  GE Yonghai , PAN Juqiang . Why Regional Literary History in China Becomes a Discipline——Academic Origins,Historical Evolution,and Theoretical Construction. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(5): 159-173.
9. [9]
  LIN Shangli . China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 5-11.
10. [10]
  WAN Yong , LI Yalan . Realizing the Function of Copyright Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 104-116.
11. [11]
  WANG Qian . AI-Generated Content and Copyright Liability: Paradoxes and Resolutions. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 118-132.
12. [12]
  RAN Gaoran . The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 117-128.
13. [13]
  WANG Xiaoyang . The Normative Dimension of Animal Consciousness——The Later Wittgenstein on Animal Minds and Its Contemporary Implications. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(6): 16-27.
14. [14]
  YANG Dian , DONG Shuhao . The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 131-146.
15. [15]
  LEI Lei . Methodological Standpoint of Digital Jurisdiction: Functionalism, or Normativism?. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 108-119.
16. [16]
  HU Jun . Three Dimensions of Aesthetic Value from the Perspective of Neuroaesthetics——On the Essence of Beauty and Other Issues. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 184-194.
17. [17]
  SU Tao . The Variations of Lyricism: On Cinematic Adaptations of Shen Congwen's Works in the 1950s. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 185-193.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 4012 Times PDF downloads: 1 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(1)
Abstract views(4012)
HTML views(836)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

The Multi-interlingual Translation from “Vernehmen” to “觉知”: On the Deconstruction of the Transcendental Meaning of Metaphysics by Martin Heidegger’s Ontological Hermeneutics

Naiqiao YANG

Available Online: 2023-03-20

Abstract: Throughout the development of Western hermeneutics, the metaphysical tradition, which dominates the meaning of the origin of the world, makes the ultimate transcendental meaning for covering the phenomenal world as well as the constitution of its moral order. The target of Martin Heidegger’s ontological hermeneutics is the transcendental meaning of “εἶναι” (Sein/Being) originated from Parmenides of Elea. After Sein und Zeit, Heidegger further discussed his ontological hermeneutics in several articles in Identität und Differenz, in order to explore the identity and difference between the meanings of “Sein” and “Dasein”. While translating Parmenides’ famous ancient Greek proverb into German, Heidegger rendered “νοεῖν” into “Vernehmen”, and he took “Denken”/“thinking” as an apposition to give the limited interpretation of meaning to prove the identity of the three concepts, “νοεῖν”, “Vernehmen” and “Denken”. However, Chinese scholars have translated “Vernehmen” into “觉知”, a Chinese concept derived from the Buddhist sutras Abhidharma Mahāvibhāṣā Śāstra. In reality, “Vernehmen” and “觉知” are two very different culturally-loaded words. Translations of these two concepts show creativity of rewriting through mistranlation. It is necessary to remind researchers who engage in the study of literary hermeneutics that what Heidegger’s ontological hermeneutics focuses on is the meaning of identity or difference between noumenon and phenomenon, not the text, especially not the literary text and its aesthetic meaning.

HTML

Relative (17)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

The Multi-interlingual Translation from “Vernehmen” to “觉知”: On the Deconstruction of the Transcendental Meaning of Metaphysics by Martin Heidegger’s Ontological Hermeneutics

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

The Multi-interlingual Translation from “Vernehmen” to “觉知”: On the Deconstruction of the Transcendental Meaning of Metaphysics by Martin Heidegger’s Ontological Hermeneutics

HTML

目录