现代社会“物质生产”中的"个人”与“总体”——马克思“1857-1858年手稿·导言”再解读

聂锦芳

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

November 2025

Article Contents

Citation: NIE Jinfang. The “Individual” and the “Totality” within the “Material Production” of Modern Society——A Reinterpretation of Marx's “Introduction” to the “1857-1858 Manuscripts”[J]. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(11): 5-19. shu

The “Individual” and the “Totality” within the “Material Production” of Modern Society——A Reinterpretation of Marx's “Introduction” to the “1857-1858 Manuscripts”

NIE Jinfang

Abstract

The “Introduction” to Marx's “1857-1858 Manuscripts” is a section “of extreme complexity and great controversy.” Due to various textual and historical factors, scholarly interpretations of its content and underlying ideas have long lacked sufficient detail, precision, and depth. Writing in the midst of the “Crisis of 1857-1858”-a major turning point in the history of capitalist development-Marx confronted the crisis of a “bubble economy” generated by unrestrained capital speculation and financial turbulence. Against this backdrop, he identified “material production” as the primary object of his system of political economy, reducing “production at a certain stage of social development” to “the production of individuals within society” in order to clarify the central role of the individual within material production. On the basis of the historical transformations of modes of production and through a critical analysis of various modern intellectual currents, Marx emphasized that “material production” in modern society ultimately aims at the realization of the independent individual. He further proposed the notion that “production is a totality”, which should be understood in terms of the internal relationship between “production in general” and its specific historical forms, as well as the integrative unity among different types and sectors of production. Marx's reflections in this regard continue to possess powerful explanatory force, critical potential, and methodological significance in the context of contemporary globalization.
- the crisis of 1857-1858,
- material production,
- the independent individual,
- the totality
References
Access
1. [1]
  ZHAO Lin , ZHANG Boyu , LIANG Hua . The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 64-76.
2. [2]
  RAN Gaoran . The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 117-128.
3. [3]
  CHEN Yinchi , WU Siqi . Interaction and Integration between Buddhist and Daoist Hagiographies in Medieval China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 157-169.
4. [4]
  LI Yushuan . New Changes and Causes of the Poetry Style of Monks in the Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 170-180.
5. [5]
  LI Ting . From The Reproductive Institution to the Fertility Transition in Contemporary China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 143-156.
6. [6]
  YING Qi . Hegel's Conception of Reconciliation and the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 23-31.
7. [7]
  QIN Zhongliang . Historical Views and Historical Facts: The Evolution of Perceptions of Fanzhen since the Song Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 181-194.
8. [8]
  SHEN Yifei . Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142.
9. [9]
  SUO Liming , WEI He'ning . Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 90-103.
10. [10]
  WANG Gang . Viewing the Cultural Intent of the “Xueheng School” from Hu Xiansu's Teachers and Friends's Group. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 206-216.
11. [11]
  LIN Shangli . China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 5-11.
12. [12]
  YU Jianxing , LIU Yuxuan . Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 77-89.
13. [13]
  LIAO Han . Popular Religion and the Formation of Local Culture——Research on the Belief in Ge Xian'gong in Northeastern Jiangxi since the Song and Yuan Dynasties. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 195-205.
14. [14]
  HE Da'an , LI Huaizheng . Digital Adjustment Mechanism in the Application of Artificial General Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 54-63.
15. [15]
  NI Liangkang . The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 12-22.
16. [16]
  WAN Yong , LI Yalan . Realizing the Function of Copyright Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 104-116.
17. [17]
  LIU Wei . Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 41-53.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 1373 Times PDF downloads: 44 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(44)
Abstract views(1373)
HTML views(309)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

The “Individual” and the “Totality” within the “Material Production” of Modern Society——A Reinterpretation of Marx's “Introduction” to the “1857-1858 Manuscripts”

NIE Jinfang

Abstract: The “Introduction” to Marx's “1857-1858 Manuscripts” is a section “of extreme complexity and great controversy.” Due to various textual and historical factors, scholarly interpretations of its content and underlying ideas have long lacked sufficient detail, precision, and depth. Writing in the midst of the “Crisis of 1857-1858”-a major turning point in the history of capitalist development-Marx confronted the crisis of a “bubble economy” generated by unrestrained capital speculation and financial turbulence. Against this backdrop, he identified “material production” as the primary object of his system of political economy, reducing “production at a certain stage of social development” to “the production of individuals within society” in order to clarify the central role of the individual within material production. On the basis of the historical transformations of modes of production and through a critical analysis of various modern intellectual currents, Marx emphasized that “material production” in modern society ultimately aims at the realization of the independent individual. He further proposed the notion that “production is a totality”, which should be understood in terms of the internal relationship between “production in general” and its specific historical forms, as well as the integrative unity among different types and sectors of production. Marx's reflections in this regard continue to possess powerful explanatory force, critical potential, and methodological significance in the context of contemporary globalization.

HTML

Relative (17)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

The “Individual” and the “Totality” within the “Material Production” of Modern Society——A Reinterpretation of Marx's “Introduction” to the “1857-1858 Manuscripts”

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

The “Individual” and the “Totality” within the “Material Production” of Modern Society——A Reinterpretation of Marx's “Introduction” to the “1857-1858 Manuscripts”

HTML

目录