摘要:
自郑玄首倡都鄙、乡遂田制不同以来,主张乡遂用沟洫法、都鄙用井田法、井田体现所有制关系的观点已经成为学界的主流。其实《周礼》"井田法"只是农耕区耕地治理法,与所有制并无直接关系。"井田法"与"沟洫法"说的是同一件事情的两个方面,它们既是农田整治办法,也是道路交通办法,还是水利法。西周金文证实,都鄙也开沟洫,耕者属于周王之民,计算田亩单位只用百亩之"夫",与《周礼》所记相去不远,但还不足以否定《孟子》"井田分公私说"。
Abstract:
Since Zheng Xuan first advocated that the land system of the "Xiangsui"(乡遂) and "Dubi"(都鄙) in The Rites of Zhou(《周礼》)was different, it has become the mainstream view in the academic circles to advocate use of the "Gouxu "(沟洫) in Xiangsui and the use of the "Jingtian"(井田) in Dubi, and the Jingtian reflect the relationship of ownership. In fact, the Jingtian system in Rites of Zhou is only a method of managing cultivated land in agricultural areas, and it has no direct relationship to the system of land ownership. The Jingtian and the Gouxu refer to two aspects of the same thing, which are not methods of farmland improvement, but also methods of road traffic and water conservancy. The Western Zhou bronze inscriptions prove that the Western Zhou Dynasty did excavate canals in the Dubi, and that the plough belonged to the subjects of the King of Zhou, and the unit of calculation of fields was only the tian(田) (hundred mu of land), which is not far from the record in The Rites of Zhou, but it is not enough to deny Mencius's "system of Jingtian".