Citation:
Baiyi WU and Yifei ZHANG. The Logic of State’s Return Phenomenon and the Dilemma of Global Governance[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(1): 80-92.
The Logic of State’s Return Phenomenon and the Dilemma of Global Governance
-
Abstract
Under the circumstance of frequent global governance crises and intensified power competition, the return of “state-centralism” has aroused people’s anxieties about the reversal momentum of economic globalization. How to reexamine the dual role of the state, either “to embrace the globalization” or “to reinforce the global governance”? The authors attempt to provide an accountable reply to this key question. By reviewing the basic functions of state, the causes of global governance deficits, the paper analyzes two types of “state return” phenomenon and the logics that derive from the market economy itself—the excessive growth of liberalist globalization inevitably weakens state’s monopoly on the one hand; and on the other hand, the role of state becomes central again when globalization has created too many pitfalls that need to be delt with and regulated. In face of global crises, the state is highlighted as the “last valve” for all global citizens to secure their individual survival. Unfortunately, populism and protectionism happen to revive at the same time. In the medium term, the restructuring process of global system will display a contracted state-centric vs. market-centric contest. The forces of state and market will entangle and reshape each other. In the long run, a new-type globalization will not prevail until the relationship between state and market gets to a rebalance. Namely, the state is restored as the main vehicle to advance national development and its external interests. However, it must steadily reform itself to better handle the lasting contradictions between socio-economic developments and effective internal and external governance. In meeting such challenges, the state would have to demonstrate and finally adopt “pragmatic flexibilities” as a neo-crieria of its core competity. In sum, the ‘reemergence of state’ in different periods and to different degrees is an inevitable phenomenon of the history. It must have distinctive dynamics accumulated for profound adjustments and changes. The state should wisely recognize and comply with them, while neither overestimating nor underestimating the limitations of its function.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
XIE Yue
. How State Capacity Is Generated in Practice——A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Governance. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 106-117.
-
[2]
XIONG Changkun
, ZHANG Ziyuan
. Multi-party Game and Informal Governance in Central-Local Fiscal Relations——Focusing on the Yinhao Reform of Guangdong Salt Tax in the Early Republic of China. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(5): 198-210.
-
[3]
XIN Fangkun
. Agile Governance for Grassroots Cross-boundary Challenges. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 91-101.
-
[4]
SUO Liming
, WEI He'ning
. Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 90-103.
-
[5]
DING Huiping
. Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 143-154.
-
[6]
LEI Lei
. Methodological Standpoint of Digital Jurisdiction: Functionalism, or Normativism?. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 108-119.
-
[7]
WANG Qi
. From Individual Experience to “Inner Experience”——Focusing on Bog om Adler. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 32-40.
-
[8]
ZHANG Jun
, FANG Hongsheng
. Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and Economic Growth. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 70-90.
-
[9]
SHEN Yifei
. Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 129-142.
-
[10]
MA Xuejun
. The Echoes of Yan Fu's Thought among Republican-Era Sociologists——Based on the Writings of Tao Menghe,Pan Guangdan,Lin Yaohua,and Fei Xiaotong. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 132-142.
-
[11]
SHI Dan
, LI Peng
. The Least-Cost Path for Energy Use in the Process of Modernization——Scenario Analysis and Theoretical Examination. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 45-58.
-
[12]
NI Liangkang
. The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 12-22.
-
[13]
YANG Dian
, DONG Shuhao
. The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 131-146.
-
[14]
ZHANG Yi
. Cognitive Transformation in Historical Research in the Age of AI——“Fluency-Induced Occlusion” in LLM-Assisted Reading of Diplomatic Manuscripts. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 29-40.
-
[15]
LIU Wei
. Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 41-53.
-
[16]
HE Lei
. What Is Kant's “Problem of the Thing-in-Itself”——With a Concurrent Critique of Mou Zongsan's Assertion and Li Minghui's Defense. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 31-40.
-
[17]
LU Mingjun
. Simulacra, Pattern Recognition, and Computational Formalism——Reflections on the Application of AI in Artistic Practice and Art History Research. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 41-55.
-
-