Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 56 Issue 10
October 2024
Article Contents

Citation: ZHENG Jinyi. Beyond Opposition:On the Concept of Status under the Common Law Theory of Contract[J]. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(10): 101-113. shu

Beyond Opposition:On the Concept of Status under the Common Law Theory of Contract

  • The internal tension between “status” and “contract” continously attracts scholarly attention to the “Maine thesis”.Past authors have both argued human society evolves “from status to contract” or,a modern trend of “from contract to status” has emerged.However,existing legal practices and academic narratives entrench the underlying oppositional paradigm of “status” and “contract”.This paper attempts to abolish this paradigm by examining the evolution of contractual theory under the Anglo-American common law.An exploration of the varying concept of “status” shows how it plays a role under the frameworks of contract theories.Based on the abstract individuality and empahsising on the formal fairness,classical contract theory shaped a system of distribution that incentivise the bourgeoisie.Neoclassical contract theory corrected the shortcomings of classical contract law and recognised the plurality of contracts and their subjects.The relational contract theory attempts to overturn the existing traditional legal system of contract law and emphasises contractual solidarity and social cooperation from the external perspective of social structure.Different meanings were embodied to the concept of status in the evolution of contract law theories: the classical contract law theory reduced status to an individuality of homogenity and abstractness; under the neoclassical contract theory,the reconcpetualisation of status enabled the laws to regain substantive fairness that has been neglected under the classical contract law; under the relational contract theory,status acts as the component of enhancing social cooperation.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      ZHAO Lin ZHANG Boyu LIANG Hua . The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 64-76.

    2. [2]

      LIN Shangli . China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 5-11.

    3. [3]

      LI Ting . From The Reproductive Institution to the Fertility Transition in Contemporary China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 143-156.

    4. [4]

      WANG Qi . From Individual Experience to “Inner Experience”——Focusing on Bog om Adler. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 32-40.

    5. [5]

      SHEN Yifei . Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142.

    6. [6]

      NI Liangkang . The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 12-22.

    7. [7]

      LIU Wei . Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 41-53.

    8. [8]

      LI Yushuan . New Changes and Causes of the Poetry Style of Monks in the Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 170-180.

    9. [9]

      WANG Gang . Viewing the Cultural Intent of the “Xueheng School” from Hu Xiansu's Teachers and Friends's Group. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 206-216.

    10. [10]

      RAN Gaoran . The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 117-128.

    11. [11]

      WAN Yong LI Yalan . Realizing the Function of Copyright Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 104-116.

Article Metrics

Article views: 1957 Times PDF downloads: 1 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(1)
  • Abstract views(1957)
  • HTML views(348)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Beyond Opposition:On the Concept of Status under the Common Law Theory of Contract

        Abstract: The internal tension between “status” and “contract” continously attracts scholarly attention to the “Maine thesis”.Past authors have both argued human society evolves “from status to contract” or,a modern trend of “from contract to status” has emerged.However,existing legal practices and academic narratives entrench the underlying oppositional paradigm of “status” and “contract”.This paper attempts to abolish this paradigm by examining the evolution of contractual theory under the Anglo-American common law.An exploration of the varying concept of “status” shows how it plays a role under the frameworks of contract theories.Based on the abstract individuality and empahsising on the formal fairness,classical contract theory shaped a system of distribution that incentivise the bourgeoisie.Neoclassical contract theory corrected the shortcomings of classical contract law and recognised the plurality of contracts and their subjects.The relational contract theory attempts to overturn the existing traditional legal system of contract law and emphasises contractual solidarity and social cooperation from the external perspective of social structure.Different meanings were embodied to the concept of status in the evolution of contract law theories: the classical contract law theory reduced status to an individuality of homogenity and abstractness; under the neoclassical contract theory,the reconcpetualisation of status enabled the laws to regain substantive fairness that has been neglected under the classical contract law; under the relational contract theory,status acts as the component of enhancing social cooperation.

          HTML

        Relative (11)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return