Citation:
XIAO Ying. Family/Home and Social Governance: Values,Methods,Objects and Subjects[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(7): 115-127.
Family/Home and Social Governance: Values,Methods,Objects and Subjects
-
Abstract
In recent years,the redistribution of housing land and the rebuilding of rural houses are important contents of rural social governance in China.Field investigation shows that the practice of relevant social policies at the grassroots level has double consequences: improving the rural living environments and promoting the integration of urban and rural areas on the one hand,and on the other hand,the elderly are forced to leave their homes and families,entering the apartments for the elderly or the nursing homes of different types and levels.However,the nursing homes of different types and levels provide different conditions for the reconstruction of “home” for the elderly,and the more complete the hardware facilities of the nursing homes,the more far away from the expectation of the elderly to “go home”.This kind of experience of the rural elderly leads to the topic of the relationships between family and social governance.The role of family in social governance can be roughly divided into four kinds: source of values,methods,objects and subjects.Social governance should care for family values as much as possible,respect the dominant position of family in governance,avoid the differentiated use of family values and family subjects,and prevent the division of family metaphor in governance philosophy and family as a tool in governance practice.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
DING Huiping
. Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 143-154.
-
[2]
XIN Fangkun
. Agile Governance for Grassroots Cross-boundary Challenges. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 91-101.
-
[3]
SUO Liming
, WEI He'ning
. Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 90-103.
-
[4]
XIE Yue
. How State Capacity Is Generated in Practice——A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Governance. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 106-117.
-
[5]
XIONG Changkun
, ZHANG Ziyuan
. Multi-party Game and Informal Governance in Central-Local Fiscal Relations——Focusing on the Yinhao Reform of Guangdong Salt Tax in the Early Republic of China. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(5): 198-210.
-
[6]
WEN Jun
. From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 145-156.
-
[7]
YU Jianxing
, LIU Yuxuan
. Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 77-89.
-
[8]
YANG Dian
, DONG Shuhao
. The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 131-146.
-
[9]
ZANG Leizhen
, LI Wei
. Bringing Context Back in——The Root Metaphor of the “Bringing Back” Approach in Social Science Research. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 84-93.
-
[10]
ZHOU Mujun
. Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 157-170.
-
[11]
MA Xuejun
. The Echoes of Yan Fu's Thought among Republican-Era Sociologists——Based on the Writings of Tao Menghe,Pan Guangdan,Lin Yaohua,and Fei Xiaotong. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 132-142.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad: