Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 54 Issue 7
November 2022
Article Contents

Citation: Guangxin FAN. Aristocracy and Huang Zongxi’s Ideal Political Order[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(7): 196-203. shu

Aristocracy and Huang Zongxi’s Ideal Political Order

  • Accepted Date: 2017-11-07
  • Huang Zongxi recognized two best regimes, or two perfect moral-political systems: one is the monarchy headed by sage-kings that is described by the Confucian Classics, while the other is the joint rule of a monarch and his ministers for the people that was proposed by Huang himself after he denied the legitimacy of his contemporary monarchy. In modern China, scholars differed with each other on whether Huang’s best regimes could be defined as democracy. As the concept of democracy comes from the Western tradition, it is necessary to go back to Western classics of political philosophy to rethink about what democracy means. Examining Aristotle’s Politics, Locke’s Second Treatise of Government and Rousseau’s Of the Social Contract, we find that the core principle of classical democracy is popular rule while that of representative democracy is popular sovereignty. Huang’s Mingyi Daifanglu ( 《明夷待访录》 ) does not endorse popular rule but the joint rule of moral and intellectual elites. And there is no sufficient evidence that the work supports popular sovereignty. Therefore, it would be hasty to conclude that the work favors democracy. In fact, it is more appropriate to understand Huang’s best regimes as aristocracy than as democracy.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      XU Yong . Community Consolidation through Institutions: An Analysis of the Micro-institutions of Small-Scale Groups. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 77-90.

    2. [2]

      XIN Fangkun . Agile Governance for Grassroots Cross-boundary Challenges. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 91-101.

    3. [3]

      SUO Liming ,  WEI He'ning . Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 90-103.

    4. [4]

      LI Xiuyun ,  LI Yue . Educational Discipline and Political Construction: The Shaping of Sun Yat-sen's Textbook Media Image in His Youth. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 206-216.

    5. [5]

      LIN Qiuyun ,  QIU Haixiang . Left-Wing Cultural Dissemination in the Political Interstics of the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression——— Take the Staging of Chongqing in the Fog as Example. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(2): 165-182.

    6. [6]

      ,  . . Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(2): 210-216.

    7. [7]

      XIE Yue . How State Capacity Is Generated in Practice——A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Governance. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 106-117.

    8. [8]

      DING Huiping . Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 143-154.

    9. [9]

      XIONG Changkun ,  ZHANG Ziyuan . Multi-party Game and Informal Governance in Central-Local Fiscal Relations——Focusing on the Yinhao Reform of Guangdong Salt Tax in the Early Republic of China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(5): 198-210.

Article Metrics

Article views: 4737 Times PDF downloads: 2 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(2)
  • Abstract views(4737)
  • HTML views(630)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Aristocracy and Huang Zongxi’s Ideal Political Order

        Abstract: Huang Zongxi recognized two best regimes, or two perfect moral-political systems: one is the monarchy headed by sage-kings that is described by the Confucian Classics, while the other is the joint rule of a monarch and his ministers for the people that was proposed by Huang himself after he denied the legitimacy of his contemporary monarchy. In modern China, scholars differed with each other on whether Huang’s best regimes could be defined as democracy. As the concept of democracy comes from the Western tradition, it is necessary to go back to Western classics of political philosophy to rethink about what democracy means. Examining Aristotle’s Politics, Locke’s Second Treatise of Government and Rousseau’s Of the Social Contract, we find that the core principle of classical democracy is popular rule while that of representative democracy is popular sovereignty. Huang’s Mingyi Daifanglu ( 《明夷待访录》 ) does not endorse popular rule but the joint rule of moral and intellectual elites. And there is no sufficient evidence that the work supports popular sovereignty. Therefore, it would be hasty to conclude that the work favors democracy. In fact, it is more appropriate to understand Huang’s best regimes as aristocracy than as democracy.

          HTML

        Relative (9)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return