Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 53 Issue 7
October 2021
Article Contents

Citation: Defeng WANG and Minqi ZHANG. On the Non-Historical Nature of Economics[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(7): 22-35. shu

On the Non-Historical Nature of Economics

  • It is still a fundamental subject to study the nature and the methodology of Capital in the field of Marxist studies today. This is because that the theory elucidated in Capital still has a very deepening significance of revelation and guidance for analyzing and examining the economical phenomena, its trends and its crisis of contemporary capitalism. Such significance could not be seen in any other kind of economical theory. This thesis tries to explain the cause of a non-fungible function of Capital for the studies of capitalism. This explanation is carried out by a comparison between the theory of Capital and economics, and its classical basis is The Poverty of Philosophy by Marx, published in 1847. The idea of The Poverty of Philosophy could be taken as an introduction to the whole theory in Capital. The comparative study of this thesis on the theory of Capital and economics is followed in three aspects: (A) The distinction between the object of economics and the object of Capital. (B) The distinction between their methodologies. (C) The distinction of their scientific nature. The key for all comparisons lies at elucidating that the theory of Capital is a science of history constructed by Marx in using perceptual dialectics.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      NI Liangkang . The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 12-22.

    2. [2]

      GE Yonghai ,  PAN Juqiang . Why Regional Literary History in China Becomes a Discipline——Academic Origins,Historical Evolution,and Theoretical Construction. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(5): 159-173.

    3. [3]

      DING Huiping . Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 143-154.

    4. [4]

      YANG Lan ,  ZHOU Yahong ,  XIAO Xinyue . Digital Infrastructure, Relative Deprivation of Household Income, and Inclusive Development. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 71-83.

    5. [5]

      YU Jianxing ,  LIU Yuxuan . Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 77-89.

    6. [6]

      ZANG Leizhen ,  LI Wei . Bringing Context Back in——The Root Metaphor of the “Bringing Back” Approach in Social Science Research. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 84-93.

    7. [7]

      ZHANG Jun ,  FANG Hongsheng . Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and Economic Growth. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 70-90.

    8. [8]

      SHEN Yifei . Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142.

    9. [9]

      LI Xiuyun ,  LI Yue . Educational Discipline and Political Construction: The Shaping of Sun Yat-sen's Textbook Media Image in His Youth. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 206-216.

    10. [10]

      LIN Qiuyun ,  QIU Haixiang . Left-Wing Cultural Dissemination in the Political Interstics of the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression——— Take the Staging of Chongqing in the Fog as Example. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(2): 165-182.

    11. [11]

      ,  . . Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(2): 210-216.

    12. [12]

      YANG Dian ,  DONG Shuhao . The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 131-146.

    13. [13]

      LIU Wei . Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 41-53.

    14. [14]

      WEN Jun . From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 145-156.

    15. [15]

      ZHOU Mujun . Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 157-170.

    16. [16]

      WANG Gang . Viewing the Cultural Intent of the “Xueheng School” from Hu Xiansu's Teachers and Friends's Group. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 206-216.

    17. [17]

      FENG Yurong . “Illuminating Ancient Learning,Introducing New Knowledge”: Xin Yizong Bidu and the Shift in the Construction of Modern Traditional Chinese Medicine Knowledge. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(6): 180-190.

Article Metrics

Article views: 2869 Times PDF downloads: 22 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(22)
  • Abstract views(2869)
  • HTML views(564)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        On the Non-Historical Nature of Economics

        Abstract: It is still a fundamental subject to study the nature and the methodology of Capital in the field of Marxist studies today. This is because that the theory elucidated in Capital still has a very deepening significance of revelation and guidance for analyzing and examining the economical phenomena, its trends and its crisis of contemporary capitalism. Such significance could not be seen in any other kind of economical theory. This thesis tries to explain the cause of a non-fungible function of Capital for the studies of capitalism. This explanation is carried out by a comparison between the theory of Capital and economics, and its classical basis is The Poverty of Philosophy by Marx, published in 1847. The idea of The Poverty of Philosophy could be taken as an introduction to the whole theory in Capital. The comparative study of this thesis on the theory of Capital and economics is followed in three aspects: (A) The distinction between the object of economics and the object of Capital. (B) The distinction between their methodologies. (C) The distinction of their scientific nature. The key for all comparisons lies at elucidating that the theory of Capital is a science of history constructed by Marx in using perceptual dialectics.

          HTML

        Relative (17)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return