三论中西哲学之根本差别

吴晓明

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

August 2023

Article Contents

Citation: WU Xiaoming. Fundamental Difference between Chinese Philosophy and Western Philosophy: A Third Thesis[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(8): 5-26. shu

Fundamental Difference between Chinese Philosophy and Western Philosophy: A Third Thesis

WU Xiaoming

Abstract

In this thesis the author tries to investigate the basic institution on which the whole Chinese philosophy operates,as well as its unique way of carrying out in this institution.As a continuation of the previous thesis,this one still takes as its central issue to look into and to contrast with the metaphysically basic institution.Such an institution is based on the division and opposition between super-perceptual and perceptual worlds,and on “truth” or “untruth” which belong respectively to division or opposition.But Chinese philosophy is quite different.It is wholly based on a unique institution of unity of dao-implement and of substance-application,i.e.,an non-metaphysical institution.The author goes further to expound politics-philosophy and history-philosophy as the essential feature,which forms a determining contrast,i.e.,they are not appear as political metaphysics (political philosophy) or historical metaphysics (historical philosophy),but means a direct joining and mutual belonging of philosophy with politics and with history,of which the essence is deep-rooted in the unique institution of Chinese philosophy.The said basic institution is summarized as “the greatest dao is not deviated from human relations and daily life”,which shows that such philosophy is,and by its nature exists,essentially being out of metaphysics.
- Chinese philosophy and Western philosophy
References
Access
1. [1]
  NI Liangkang . The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 12-22.
2. [2]
  GAO Jianping . Philosophical Reflections on Beauty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 170-179.
3. [3]
  HE Jun . Confucius's Paradigm Shaping of Chinese Philosophy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 56-69.
4. [4]
  XU Xiangdong . Consciousness and The Moral Status of AI Agents. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 5-15.
5. [5]
  WANG Gang . Viewing the Cultural Intent of the “Xueheng School” from Hu Xiansu's Teachers and Friends's Group. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 206-216.
6. [6]
  FENG Yurong . “Illuminating Ancient Learning,Introducing New Knowledge”: Xin Yizong Bidu and the Shift in the Construction of Modern Traditional Chinese Medicine Knowledge. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(6): 180-190.
7. [7]
  LI Xiuyun , LI Yue . Educational Discipline and Political Construction: The Shaping of Sun Yat-sen's Textbook Media Image in His Youth. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 206-216.
8. [8]
  LIN Qiuyun , QIU Haixiang . Left-Wing Cultural Dissemination in the Political Interstics of the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression——— Take the Staging of Chongqing in the Fog as Example. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(2): 165-182.
9. [9]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(2): 210-216.
10. [10]
  GE Yonghai , PAN Juqiang . Why Regional Literary History in China Becomes a Discipline——Academic Origins,Historical Evolution,and Theoretical Construction. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(5): 159-173.
11. [11]
  DING Huiping . Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 143-154.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 2547 Times PDF downloads: 4 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(4)
Abstract views(2547)
HTML views(487)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Fundamental Difference between Chinese Philosophy and Western Philosophy: A Third Thesis

WU Xiaoming

Abstract: In this thesis the author tries to investigate the basic institution on which the whole Chinese philosophy operates,as well as its unique way of carrying out in this institution.As a continuation of the previous thesis,this one still takes as its central issue to look into and to contrast with the metaphysically basic institution.Such an institution is based on the division and opposition between super-perceptual and perceptual worlds,and on “truth” or “untruth” which belong respectively to division or opposition.But Chinese philosophy is quite different.It is wholly based on a unique institution of unity of dao-implement and of substance-application,i.e.,an non-metaphysical institution.The author goes further to expound politics-philosophy and history-philosophy as the essential feature,which forms a determining contrast,i.e.,they are not appear as political metaphysics (political philosophy) or historical metaphysics (historical philosophy),but means a direct joining and mutual belonging of philosophy with politics and with history,of which the essence is deep-rooted in the unique institution of Chinese philosophy.The said basic institution is summarized as “the greatest dao is not deviated from human relations and daily life”,which shows that such philosophy is,and by its nature exists,essentially being out of metaphysics.

HTML

Relative (11)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

Fundamental Difference between Chinese Philosophy and Western Philosophy: A Third Thesis

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Fundamental Difference between Chinese Philosophy and Western Philosophy: A Third Thesis

HTML

目录