Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 57 Issue 10
November 2025
Article Contents

Citation: JIANG Xiaojuan. Distributed AI Governance: Technology System Gaming and Social Government Synergy[J]. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(10): 5-13. shu

Distributed AI Governance: Technology System Gaming and Social Government Synergy

  • Over the past decade, the issue of AI governancehas emerged as a focal and high-profile concern in both national and global technology governance. Despite the repeated release of related governance consensus at various national and high-level global forums, implementation has been sluggish and effectiveness limited. The reason is that these efforts have focused on forming a centralized governance model based on laws and regulations with universal applicability. However, such a model fails to align with the intrinsic characteristics of AI development and the diverse intentions of societal stakeholders. In other words, there is a lack of incentive compatibility mechanisms. This paper introduces the concept of distributed AI governance:a decentralized AI compliance community predicated on technological mechanisms to ensure mutual trust and adherence to shared rules. Such a governance paradigm aligns more coherently with both the logic of AI technology and societal preferences. The core of the analysis lies in examining the incentive and constraint mechanisms that promote the broad inclusion of heterogeneous stakeholders into distributed governance. These mechanisms encompass alignment with societal values, maintenance of corporate reputation, market competition pressures, consensus within technical communities, and the assurance capabilities of technological infrastructure. In the future, AI governance should encourage groups with the same willingness and ability to form local governance communities with diversified scales and rules, and these communities should constitute a distributed governance network throughout the whole society, converging the will and actions of millions of subjects, and accumulating small goodness into big goodness. Simultaneously, the indispensable role of centralized governance anchored in public authority must be preserved to effectively govern AI behaviors that provoke serious safety, ethical, or value-based concerns.
  • 加载中

Article Metrics

Article views: 349 Times PDF downloads: 10 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(10)
  • Abstract views(349)
  • HTML views(100)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Distributed AI Governance: Technology System Gaming and Social Government Synergy

        Abstract: Over the past decade, the issue of AI governancehas emerged as a focal and high-profile concern in both national and global technology governance. Despite the repeated release of related governance consensus at various national and high-level global forums, implementation has been sluggish and effectiveness limited. The reason is that these efforts have focused on forming a centralized governance model based on laws and regulations with universal applicability. However, such a model fails to align with the intrinsic characteristics of AI development and the diverse intentions of societal stakeholders. In other words, there is a lack of incentive compatibility mechanisms. This paper introduces the concept of distributed AI governance:a decentralized AI compliance community predicated on technological mechanisms to ensure mutual trust and adherence to shared rules. Such a governance paradigm aligns more coherently with both the logic of AI technology and societal preferences. The core of the analysis lies in examining the incentive and constraint mechanisms that promote the broad inclusion of heterogeneous stakeholders into distributed governance. These mechanisms encompass alignment with societal values, maintenance of corporate reputation, market competition pressures, consensus within technical communities, and the assurance capabilities of technological infrastructure. In the future, AI governance should encourage groups with the same willingness and ability to form local governance communities with diversified scales and rules, and these communities should constitute a distributed governance network throughout the whole society, converging the will and actions of millions of subjects, and accumulating small goodness into big goodness. Simultaneously, the indispensable role of centralized governance anchored in public authority must be preserved to effectively govern AI behaviors that provoke serious safety, ethical, or value-based concerns.

          HTML

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return